Data

Random thoughts/ideas/opinions, with an occasional comment about being deaf

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Armed & Famous

So, CBS has a new reality show coming out called "Armed & Famous".

Why? Why on God's green earth do we care about five or six has-beens who become cops? I'm sure Muncie, IN, is a nice town. Why would they degrade themselves by allowing those people to join their police force?

CBS should be sued for misrepresentation. Who calls Jack Osborne famous? LaToya Jackson (who's probably Michael on a bad clothing day)? OK, I'll give them Erik Estrada, but please don't put him in those tight CHiPs pants again.

Sunday, May 28, 2006

Pitt

Brad, not Michael or the Pirates... why the hell does anyone care that he just had a baby with Angelina Jolie? Does it make a difference to anyone that he shacked up with her while he was still married? What's the difference between him and Kevin Federline? A boatload of talent, probably... both of them could certainly use a heaping helping of Get-Over-Yourself.

Monday, May 15, 2006

NYC Parks

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NY_PARKS_WI_FI_BAOL-?SITE=NYNYD&SECTION=MIDEAST&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Internet access in NYC parks? Don't people go to parks to get away from everything?
Has there been an outbreak of people walking through Central Park and suddenly thinking, "Gee, I can't remember the names of Jack the Ripper's five victims, and I don't think I can wait till I get home to check the internet"?

What's next? Wireless access in Yankee Stadium, where you can catch the games on MLB.com instead of sitting in the bright sun watching Jeter bounce another throw to first base?

Monday, May 08, 2006

Gallaudet

So… Dr. Jane Fernandes isn’t qualified to become President of Gallaudet because she grew up mainstreamed and didn’t learn American Sign Language until she was 23, so therefore she’s not “deaf enough” to lead this prestigious college?

I have a few choice words for those protesters: SHUT UP. Who the hell died and made you God of all that is Deaf? What gives any of you the right to decide who’s Deaf and who isn’t? You’re probably the same people who said on TV in 1995 that Heather Whitestone shouldn’t be looked upon as a deaf Miss America, because she's from a mainstreamed background and doesn't know sign language. With that attitude, why the hell would she want to? Do you really think that insulting people is going to make them come around to your point of view?

This is completely the opposite of the intentions of the 1988 protest. They were concerned about the election of a president who had no background in Deaf education, the language, or the culture. You, on the other hand, are saying that only people who fit into your little definition of “Deaf” should be eligible for that position.

To become President of Grambling, do you need to be from the deep, poor South? To become President of Notre Dame, do you have to have been an ex-altar boy molested by a priest? Yes, you could have those backgrounds and still become President, but you will not have become President solely because of that background. Jane Fernandes' background as a mainstreamed student shaped her destiny; it did not decide her destiny.

Does Deaf Culture really have so restricted a view of itself that variations on a theme cannot be accepted and integrated? Twenty years ago, the idea of cochlear implants was a sign of the Apocalypse. Now, it’s as common as tongue studs or middle-aged men with 20-year-old wives. I guess that means all those people who came up to me back in the 80s and said that I was destroying Deaf Culture were… completely moronic idiots.

Dr. Jordan said 18 years ago that "deaf people can do anything except hear". He didn't say "residential deaf people" or "mainstreamed deaf people". It was "deaf people". Why must it be clarified now? Did Dr. Jordan do such a terrible job that you don’t want another person like him? Dr. Fernandes hasn't even started her job yet, and you've already made up your mind that she's going to kill Deaf Culture and bury it in the backyard. Eighteen years ago, the four leaders of the protest fought for an integrated Board of Trustees. You've got it now, and these actions you're undertaking just show that you don't trust that Board to make reasonable, well-informed decisions about Gallaudet's future.

If Dr. Fernandes can single-handedly set back Deaf Culture a hundred years (which I am sure is not her intention), then, in my view, it just shows that perhaps Deaf Culture isn’t as strong as its “members” would like to think.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Keith Hernandez

Well... is Hernandez an ass for his comments about the Padres' massage therapist not being allowed on the bench because she's a "girl"? Maybe. But, for god's sake, does everyone who disagrees with the masses have to be crucified at the stake? It's not as if Hernandez' comments prevented her from doing her job.
No matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many sensitivity seminars are held, there's always going to be male and female chauvinist pigs. Why let a few clowns represent the entire species?

Thursday, March 23, 2006

'86

This being the 20th anniversary of the Mets '86 season, here's something I occasionally like to ponder: what would have happened if Bill Buckner had fielded Mookie Wilson's grounder in Game 6?

I have always held that, even if Buckner had come up with the ball, he would not have beaten Mookie to the bag. I couldn't see Buckner stopping his sideways movement and starting forward again, especially with his bad ankles. I also don't think Bob Stanley would have gotten to first in time to beat Mookie either, the way Mookie busted out of the box.

However, if Buckner has the ball, then Ray Knight has to stop at third. So, it would have been 1st and 3rd, still two outs, and Howard Johnson at the plate. I'm sure that Boston had no one up in the bullpen, so they would have had to stick with Stanley.

I can see Mookie stealing second. I know that it didn't matter if he was in scoring position, since Knight was the winning run. But the Sox were reeling... just one out away from a championshp and all of a sudden, single by Carter, single by Mitchell, RBI single by Knight, Mitchell scores on a passed ball/wild pitch. So, why not increase the pressure on the Sox? Maybe Rich Gedman makes a bad throw? Maybe Stanley balks or tosses another pitch that Gedman can't reach? There's certainly no worry about a double steal, but Mookie's presence on the bases is another reminder that they just needed one more strike.

What would HoJo have done? He was not yet known as a power hitter, and he did strike out a lot (although so did Mookie).

Supposing Mookie does steal. Do the Sox then walk HoJo to face Lee Mazzilli?

Or Stanley gets them out of the inning. I don't remember who the Sox would have had coming up, but they're definitely feeling "what happened?"

Friday, March 10, 2006

television

I'm beginning to firmly believe that the vast majority of ideas for current television shows originated in the pot-smoking circle from "That '70s Show". Just a few examples:

"Bridezillas". What is so interesting about watching brides-to-be bitch, moan, threaten, cajole, whine, and become complete assholes to family, friends, and the public? And then, when it's all over, they take PRIDE in having been a bridezilla. Is this how low television has gone when that kind of behavior is glorified?

"There and Back". Is there anyone out there who actually remembers O-Town? Better yet, is there anyone who cares about O-Town? I have to feel sorry for the guy, though... growing up with the name Ashley must have guaranteed a daily ass-kicking on the playground. Having been part of O-Town should be grounds for a daily ass-kicking.

"Wife Swap". If it wasn't TV, it would be illegal.

"American Idol". Anne Robinson could make Simon cry.